Make-BelieveThe winner of the Psi Phi Award for Best Star Trek Short Story of 2006, “Make-Believe” presents a radically different sort of Star Trek story that speaks to the series’ enduring appeal.
Mar
7
On the Conquest of Patagonia
March 7, 2010 by Allyn · Leave a Comment
Queen Isabella of Spain has long been a dangerous enemy. Her forces are strong, her will indomitable. Among the wilds of Patagonia, I thought, she would prove to be a formidable ally.
Patagonia is an interesting land. Legend has it that the Dread Pirate Roberts retired there and raises sheep among its hills to this day, and I can see the appeal. The land is rugged. The rocky coasts give way to expansive forests in the lowlands, and inland there are rugged hills and lakes in the high country.
My colony was along the coast, among the forests. Isabella’s colony was further inland, just to the southwest of a highland lake. Somewhere to the north lay the colonies of our two foes — Maurice of Nassau and Frederick the Great. Maurice may style himself a banker and a gentleman, but he is also a great military strategist. Frederick’s military renown precedes him; there is no need to recount his exploits on the field of battle.
I settled upon my strategy. I would scout the coasts of the highland lake, then find a break in the coastal forests to the Atlantic shore. Once I had located a suitable break in the forests, I would build two long walls, running in parallel through the break from ocean to lake, thus separating my colony from my enemies to the north.
The highland lake was small, and as I had walled off the eastern approaches to the lake, our enemies’ armies would be able to skirt the western shore of the lake, descend from the highlands, and attack Isabella’s colony directly. Would Isabella be able to withstand the possibility of two armies — Maurice’s and Frederick’s — attacking her colony?
I concentrated on gathering resources — food, wood, coin I also built a second group of walls, this one running south from the lake, between my colony and Isabella’s, with frontier outposts along the native trade route, as a way of choking off a possible attack from our enemies if they had been able to either maneuver around or through Isabella’s colony.
I did not, however, pay much note to Isabella’s state. Thus, when she sent an appeal for help — her colony was under attack by a combined army of Frederick and Maurice — I was in little state myself to come to her aid; while I had built a barracks to train musketeers, I had concentrated on my economic needs, not my military needs on the theory that a strong economy can drive a strong military.
Isabella was able to keep her foes at bay, and I quickly trained musketeers and dispatched them to her colony. My forces arrived on time; they defeated Frederick’s cavalry and prevented Isabella’s town center from being burned to the ground. But much of her colony had been razed.
A small army of musketeers and grenadiers attacked a fort Maurice was building along the western shore of the highland lake. I realized that with Isabella weakened, I would have to take the lead not only in attacking our foes but in protecting Isabella’s colony until she could rebuild.
Thus, I built a fort within the ruins of her colony, a barracks, and an artillery foundary. I then built a wall from the western shore of the lake to a cliff to the northwest of Isabella’s colony, to further choke off the passage around the lake, and I built an outpost on the cliff’s edge to guard against incurssions by Frederick and Maurice.
Using my fort as an advance base, I built a large army of musketeers, grenadiers, and hussars. I also had a detachment of Scottish Highlanders sent from the mother country. In scouting the lake earlier, I knew that Frederick’s colony was to the north-northwest of the lake, and my intention was to overwhelm Frederick’s colony and burn it to the ground, seize the trade route to his north, then regroup my forces and march eastward into Maurice’s colony. Such a strategy could have led to disaster, however; it would be possible, given the way the colonies were arranged, that my army could be caught between Frederick’s forces and an army of Maurice’s, sent in relief of a beleagured ally. To minimize this risk, I landed several musketeers on the northeastern shore of the lake and sent them to attack the southern outskirts of Maurice’s colony as my main army, striking out from Isabella’s colony, reached Frederick’s colony. These brave musketeers, I knew, would have little chance to destroy much of Maurice’s colony; they were there to draw off Maurice’s forces, and I expected none to survive. Indeed, they did not; Maurice brought out falconets and mowed down my line of musketeers, and he used his cavalry to run down the rest. But this suicide mission, for such it was, served its purpose; I brought down Frederick’s colony with ease as he put up little resistance to my overwhelming army.
Maurice, rather than attack my main army, as it regrouped in the scorched ruins that had been Frederick’s colony, turned his own attentions to the walls I had built to the south of his colony, cutting it off from my own. He sent an army of pikemen and falconets to bring down the walls, and I sent a detachment of Highlands and hussars to combat their attack. A galleon on the lake shelled Maurice’s cannon, and the hussars finished off his pikemen, and though Maurice’s force had succeeded in breaking through the walls, they were unable to capitalize on this victory; the walls were rebuilt, gates were constructed, and I planned out my final assault on Maurice’s colony.
I would use a two-pronged attack. A native trade route ran to the north of Maurice’s colony. I would train more forces at the fort and barracks in Isabella’s colony — which, by this time, was rebuilt, but largely along economic, rather than military lines &mdsah; and send them north to meet with the regrouped army in Frederick’s ruins. This force would move east, capture the native trading post to the northwest of Maurice’s colony, and then turn south, to attack the colony from the north. Then, coming from my own colony, would be an army of musketeers, grenadiers, Swiss pikemen, Highlander mercenaries, and falconets to attack Maurice from the south. This would ensnare Maurice in a vice grip, and victory would be mine.
The actual assault on Maurice’s colony was a swift affair. To my surprise, Maurice refused to offer his surrender. His ally Frederick had been quick to concede defeat under similar circumstances; in that case, once his town center fell and his farms were burning, Frederick saw little profit in prolonging his agony. Maurice, conversely, suffered his defeats in silence. Building after building fell. Barracks. Banks. Churches. Homes. Only when he had no army left in the field and fewer than five buildings still standing did Maurice admit, grudgingly, “You have beaten me, and I wish to offer my surrender.” At that point, there was nothing left to surrender. Nothing worthwhile, that is.
From the Atlantic coast to the rocky plains and highlands, Patagonia was mine.
Mar
6
On Senator Judd Gregg’s Ahistory Lesson
March 6, 2010 by Allyn · Leave a Comment
Dear Senator Judd Gregg:
I read with some interest your recent comments on the Founding Fathers and the need for supermajority votes in the United States Senate. I believe you said:
The Founding Fathers realized when they structured this they wanted checks and balances. They didn’t want things rushed through. They saw the parliamentary system. They knew it didn’t work. So they set up the place, as George Washington described it, where you take the hot coffee out of the cup and you pour it into the saucer and you let it cool a little bit and you let people look at it and make sure it’s done correctly. That’s why we have the 60-vote situation over here in the Senate to require that things get full consideration.
I find this rather interesting.
First, I was unaware that President Washington drank his coffee from a saucer and not a cup. I personally drink a great deal of coffee, and I would never have thought about drinking it from a saucer. Indeed, I’m not even sure that I have a saucer. Which is probably a good thing, because I really do enjoy drinking coffee out of a mug; it might take two dozen saucers of coffee to make the equivalent of a single mug.
And second, if the Founding Fathers wanted supermajorities in the Senate, why would the Constitution give the Vice President the power to break tie votes? Under a supermajority system, there would never be a tie vote for the Vice President to have to break. And, it occurs to me, how is it that John Adams, one of those Founding Fathers, cast twenty-nine tie-breaking votes in his eight years as Vice President?
E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post makes this point:
Hatch grandly cited “America’s Founders” as wanting the Senate to be about “deliberation.” But the Founders said nothing in the Constitution about the filibuster, let alone “reconciliation.” Judging from what they put in the actual document, the Founders would be appalled at the idea that every major bill should need the votes of three-fifths of the Senate to pass.
I think, Senator Gregg, that if we are to look to the Founding Fathers, we should actually look at what they did. Not what you think they did, when they didn’t actually do that.
After all, Senator, when you wanted a vote on drilling in Alaska for oil, this is what you said: “Is there something wrong with majority rules? I don’t think so.”
So, unless the ghosts of George Washington and James Madison magically appeared to you just now, I think your history lesson is bunkum.
Sincerely,
Someone with a grasp of history
Mar
6
On Non-Who TARDIS Companions
March 6, 2010 by Allyn · 3 Comments
Years ago, my friend Michael had a game. Take a movie or television show. Then imagine the TARDIS materializing. There are some stories you can look at and say, “This is a Doctor Who story; all it needs is the Doctor.” The game works best with a “base under siege”-type structure, so common to the Patrick Troughton era. Alien 3. Jurassic Park. Event Horizon.
One that works surprisingly well, despite absolutely no “base under siege”-ness, is DuckTales. But I’ve written of my desire to write a Doctor Who/Uncle Scrooge crossover before.
Historical series also works well, largely because Doctor Who has a foot in the past anyway.
My variant on the game is this — take a character from a television series or movie, and imagine that character as a Doctor Who companion.
This one’s trickier. Would the Doctor take this person aboard the TARDIS? Why? And would they mesh?
For years, I have considered Jean-Luc Picard a Doctor Who companion. Specifically, I think he traveled with the sixth Doctor and Frobisher. Yes, the shape-shifting penguin. For the Doctor, this is sometime after “Trial of a Time Lord,” but before he meets Mel. For Picard, this is after the loss of the Stargazer and before he’s given command of the Enterprise-D, during his seven “lost” years. Picture the stiff Picard with the bombastic Doctor and a snarky penguin, and it works. There’s no one to say that they didn’t travel together…
Last weekend, another one came to me.
I was watching The Tudors. In a way, it depressed me a little; as I watched one episode after another, it only made me yearn for a pure historical on the new Doctor Who series, which I know isn’t likely to happen. Kids like their monsters, after all.
As I watched The Tudors, an idea kept nagging at me.
Princess Mary, Henry VIII’s eldest daughter and eventually Queen “Bloody” Mary, would make a fantastic companion.
She’s fiercely intelligent. She’s erudite. She’s bitter. She’s haughty. She’s snarky as all get out. She’s also stiff and prim and proper, and she wants things to be a certain way. She’s led a rough life, there’s anger simmering just beneath the surface. She’s very much her father’s daughter.
And I think the Doctor would take her on, just to try and fix that. Oh, he knows it’s a lost cause, he knows that she’s going to be bitter and vindictive as a reigning queen. The Doctor would know that he shouldn’t take her for a trip, but he also couldn’t help himself; he’d want to try and open her eyes. Which may actually result in the opposite effect; maybe Mary wouldn’t have been so “bloody” had the Doctor not attempted his intervention.
The Doctor and Princess Mary. It would be fantastic.
Anyone have their own thoughts on non-Doctor Who characters who would make excellent companions?
Mar
3
On More Heritage Foundation Tomfoolery
March 3, 2010 by Allyn · Leave a Comment
For reasons that pass beyond my understanding, the Heritage Foundation has sent me another survey.
This makes… what? The fourth in the past six months? Who do they think I am?
This one is called “the official 2010 Taxpayer Ballot of Fiscal Responsibility.”
Let us quote.
Ms. Gibson, unchecked spending was bad enough in a Republican administration — one that at least pretended to be conservative. Now that the liberals are in charge of Congress and the White House, the epidemic of uncontrolled spending is worse than ever. That means our mission is more important than ever: We can’t afford to give any member of Congress a pass on their use — and abuse — of your tax dollars. Uncontrolled spending affects you and every U.S. taxpayer.
Seriously. Who does the Heritage Foundation think I am? A Glenn Beck reader?
No, really. I think that quoted passage could easily have come out of that one Glenn Beck book I read.
The questionnaire is amusing. No, really. I laughed a lot at it. I’ll fill it out later.
But really. You’d think they have the idea by now that I’m not a “conservative.”
You’d think.
Feb
26
On My Steampunk-Style
February 26, 2010 by Allyn · Leave a Comment
Seen on others’ blogs…
If I were to dress in a steampunk-style, what would I be? Hmm…
Your result for The Steampunk Style Test…
The Ragamuffin
25% Elegant, 41% Technological, 30% Historical, 24% Adventurous and 46% Playful!

You are the Ragamuffin, the embodiment of steampunk playfulness. Chances are, you approach the genre from a much more casual and lighthearted standpoint than most other fans. To you, there is always an element of play inherent in the genre, and you may very well enjoy fashion as much for the opportunity to dress up as for the style itself. You probably wear goggles as an accessory, and rarely as actual eye-protection. Your outfits are likely to incorporate a lot of brown or cream, and combine large boots, Victorian corsets or vests, aviator caps or bowler hats, and gypsy skirts or slacks, simply because you like them all.
Take The Steampunk Style Test at HelloQuizzy
The Ragamuffin!
I like the sound of that. It rolls around the tongue well…






